| From: | Martín Marqués <martin(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 10.0 |
| Date: | 2016-05-14 18:02:10 |
| Message-ID: | 5278c360-30c9-094a-0d67-8185b0ffce9b@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
El 13/05/16 a las 15:36, Josh berkus escribió:
> On 05/13/2016 11:31 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> Josh berkus wrote:
>>
>>> Anyway, can we come up with a consensus of some minimum changes it will
>>> take to make the next version 10.0?
>>
>> I think the next version should be 10.0 no matter what changes we put
>> in.
>>
>
> Well, if we adopt 2-part version numbers, it will be. Maybe that's the
> easiest thing? Then we never have to have this discussion again, which
> certainly appeals to me ...
Wasn't there some controversy about switching to major.minor versioning
this in -advocacy?
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/ee13fd2bb44cb086b457be34e81d5f78@biglumber.com
IMO, this versioning is pretty good and people understand it well, with
the other will be using postgres 13 by 2020, which isn't far away. ;)
--
Martín Marqués http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Petr Jelinek | 2016-05-14 18:02:19 | Re: 10.0 |
| Previous Message | Martín Marqués | 2016-05-14 17:53:04 | Re: 10.0 |