Re: 10.0

From: Martín Marqués <martin(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Josh berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 10.0
Date: 2016-05-14 17:53:04
Message-ID: e6cbe1fd-6601-631e-166b-a11c82155fb2@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

El 13/05/16 a las 15:31, Alvaro Herrera escribió:
> Josh berkus wrote:
>
>> Anyway, can we come up with a consensus of some minimum changes it will
>> take to make the next version 10.0?
>
> I think the next version should be 10.0 no matter what changes we put
> in.

+1

And another +1 on Tom's opinion on it being too late after beta1 has
been released.

--
Martín Marqués http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

  • Re: 10.0 at 2016-05-13 18:31:37 from Alvaro Herrera

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martín Marqués 2016-05-14 18:02:10 Re: 10.0
Previous Message Tom Lane 2016-05-14 17:51:31 exit() behavior on Windows?