Re: 10.0

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Josh berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 10.0
Date: 2016-05-13 18:31:37
Message-ID: 20160513183137.GA10491@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Josh berkus wrote:

> Anyway, can we come up with a consensus of some minimum changes it will
> take to make the next version 10.0?

I think the next version should be 10.0 no matter what changes we put
in.

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

  • Re: 10.0 at 2016-05-13 18:28:12 from Josh berkus

Responses

  • Re: 10.0 at 2016-05-13 18:35:43 from Petr Jelinek
  • Re: 10.0 at 2016-05-13 18:36:32 from Josh berkus
  • Re: 10.0 at 2016-05-13 18:36:46 from David Fetter
  • Re: 10.0 at 2016-05-13 18:45:20 from Vik Fearing
  • Re: 10.0 at 2016-05-13 18:49:45 from Tom Lane
  • Re: 10.0 at 2016-05-13 23:32:57 from Mark Dilger
  • Re: 10.0 at 2016-05-14 17:53:04 from Martín Marqués

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Petr Jelinek 2016-05-13 18:35:43 Re: 10.0
Previous Message Josh berkus 2016-05-13 18:28:12 Re: 10.0