Re: 10.0

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Josh berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 10.0
Date: 2016-05-13 18:45:21
Message-ID: 20160513184521.GA11091@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Josh berkus wrote:

> Well, if we adopt 2-part version numbers, it will be. Maybe that's the
> easiest thing? Then we never have to have this discussion again, which
> certainly appeals to me ...

-1

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

  • Re: 10.0 at 2016-05-13 18:36:32 from Josh berkus

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2016-05-13 18:46:21 Re: 10.0
Previous Message Vik Fearing 2016-05-13 18:45:20 Re: 10.0