| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Vik Fearing <vik(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Josh berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 10.0 |
| Date: | 2016-05-13 18:46:21 |
| Message-ID: | CA+Tgmob_-Z4m8HkUamzEtWgmMdisOV-HR88vy_B4z=vue8KDog@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 2:45 PM, Vik Fearing <vik(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr> wrote:
> On 05/13/2016 08:31 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> Josh berkus wrote:
>>
>>> Anyway, can we come up with a consensus of some minimum changes it will
>>> take to make the next version 10.0?
>>
>> I think the next version should be 10.0 no matter what changes we put
>> in.
>
> +1
>
> Let's even stamp it 10.0devel from the get-go.
If making this one 10.0 is out, then I'm for that proposal.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2016-05-13 18:48:42 | Re: Lets (not) break all the things. Was: [pgsql-advocacy] 9.6 -> 10.0 |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2016-05-13 18:45:21 | Re: 10.0 |