| From: | Mark Kirkwood <mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, sthomas(at)optionshouse(dot)com, Tomas Vondra <tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Reliability with RAID 10 SSD and Streaming Replication |
| Date: | 2013-05-23 02:04:32 |
| Message-ID: | 519D7930.2040308@catalyst.net.nz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On 23/05/13 13:32, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
> On 23/05/13 13:01, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>
>> On 05/22/2013 04:37 PM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 5:42 PM, Joshua D. Drake
>>> <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>>>> I am curious how the 710 or S3700 stacks up against the new M500 from
>>>> Crucial? I know Intel is kind of the goto for these things but the
>>>> m500 is
>>>> power off protected and rated at: Endurance: 72TB total bytes
>>>> written (TBW),
>>>> equal to 40GB per day for 5 years .
>>>
>>> I don't think the m500 is power safe (nor is any drive at the <1$/gb
>>> price point).
>>
>> According the the data sheet it is power safe.
>>
>> http://investors.micron.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=732650
>> http://www.micron.com/products/solid-state-storage/client-ssd/m500-ssd
>>
>>
>
> Yeah - they apparently have a capacitor on board.
>
Make that quite a few capacitors (top right corner):
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Merlin Moncure | 2013-05-23 02:17:15 | Re: Reliability with RAID 10 SSD and Streaming Replication |
| Previous Message | Greg Smith | 2013-05-23 01:53:31 | Re: Reliability with RAID 10 SSD and Streaming Replication |
