From: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, sthomas(at)optionshouse(dot)com, Tomas Vondra <tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Reliability with RAID 10 SSD and Streaming Replication |
Date: | 2013-05-23 01:53:31 |
Message-ID: | 519D769B.1030406@2ndQuadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On 5/22/13 4:57 PM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> Oh, the major vendors will still keep their
> rip-off going on a little longer selling their storage trays, raid
> controllers, entry/mid level SANS, SAS HBAs etc at huge markup to
> customers who don't need them (some will still need them, but the bar
> suddenly just got spectacularly raised before you have to look into
> enterprise gear).
The angle to distinguish "enterprise" hardware is moving on to error
related capabilities. Soon we'll see SAS drives with the 520 byte
sectors and checksumming for example.
And while SATA drives have advanced a long way, they haven't caught up
with SAS for failure handling. It's still far too easy for a single
crazy SATA device to force crippling bus resets for example. Individual
SATA ports don't expect to share things with others, while SAS chains
have a much better protocol for handling things.
--
Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support www.2ndQuadrant.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mark Kirkwood | 2013-05-23 02:04:32 | Re: Reliability with RAID 10 SSD and Streaming Replication |
Previous Message | Greg Smith | 2013-05-23 01:41:32 | Re: Reliability with RAID 10 SSD and Streaming Replication |