| From: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "sthomas(at)optionshouse(dot)com" <sthomas(at)optionshouse(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Reliability with RAID 10 SSD and Streaming Replication |
| Date: | 2013-05-23 02:17:15 |
| Message-ID: | CAHyXU0x3Qyub1fwcoepaKYs9nOKYoNO8r28VA9yC4b+M-CAFQw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Wednesday, May 22, 2013, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On 05/22/2013 04:37 PM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 5:42 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
wrote:
>>>
>>> I am curious how the 710 or S3700 stacks up against the new M500 from
>>> Crucial? I know Intel is kind of the goto for these things but the m500
is
>>> power off protected and rated at: Endurance: 72TB total bytes written
(TBW),
>>> equal to 40GB per day for 5 years .
>>
>> I don't think the m500 is power safe (nor is any drive at the <1$/gb
>> price point).
>
> According the the data sheet it is power safe.
>
> http://investors.micron.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=732650
> http://www.micron.com/products/solid-state-storage/client-ssd/m500-ssd
Wow, that seems like a pretty good deal then assuming it works and performs
decently.
merlin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Smith | 2013-05-23 02:22:24 | Re: Reliability with RAID 10 SSD and Streaming Replication |
| Previous Message | Mark Kirkwood | 2013-05-23 02:04:32 | Re: Reliability with RAID 10 SSD and Streaming Replication |