From: | Mark Kirkwood <mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz> |
---|---|
To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, sthomas(at)optionshouse(dot)com, Tomas Vondra <tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Reliability with RAID 10 SSD and Streaming Replication |
Date: | 2013-05-23 01:32:29 |
Message-ID: | 519D71AD.4080606@catalyst.net.nz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On 23/05/13 13:01, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> On 05/22/2013 04:37 PM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 5:42 PM, Joshua D. Drake
>> <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>>> I am curious how the 710 or S3700 stacks up against the new M500 from
>>> Crucial? I know Intel is kind of the goto for these things but the
>>> m500 is
>>> power off protected and rated at: Endurance: 72TB total bytes
>>> written (TBW),
>>> equal to 40GB per day for 5 years .
>>
>> I don't think the m500 is power safe (nor is any drive at the <1$/gb
>> price point).
>
> According the the data sheet it is power safe.
>
> http://investors.micron.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=732650
> http://www.micron.com/products/solid-state-storage/client-ssd/m500-ssd
>
>
Yeah - they apparently have a capacitor on board.
Their write endurance is where they don't compare so favorably to the
S3700 (they are *much* cheaper mind you):
- M500 120GB drive: 40GB per day for 5 years
- S3700 100GB drive: 1000GB per day for 5 years
But great to see more reasonably priced SSD with power off protection.
Cheers
Mark
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Smith | 2013-05-23 01:41:32 | Re: Reliability with RAID 10 SSD and Streaming Replication |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2013-05-23 01:01:56 | Re: Reliability with RAID 10 SSD and Streaming Replication |