Re: [Snowball-discuss] Snowball release cycle ?

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Grant Ingersoll" <gsingers(at)apache(dot)org>, "Richard Boulton" <richard(at)lemurconsulting(dot)com>
Cc: <snowball-discuss(at)lists(dot)tartarus(dot)org>, "Pgsql Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [Snowball-discuss] Snowball release cycle ?
Date: 2009-04-01 21:44:53
Message-ID: 49D39A05.EE98.0025.0@wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>>> Richard Boulton <richard(at)lemurconsulting(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 05:10:01PM -0400, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>> No, it would have to be ASL 2, but that is pretty similar to BSD,
no?
>> (caveat: IANAL) i.e non-viral, free to use however you want, just

>> don't take credit for it. Everything I've read says the two are
>> completely compatible
>
> As I understand it, ASL 2 is incompatible with GPL 2, at least
according to
> the FSF. This would be a showstopper problem for me.

Where does GPL come into it? (I hadn't seen that mentioned before for
either product.)

-Kevin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-04-01 21:51:35 Speeding up ExecProject
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2009-04-01 21:41:53 Re: [Snowball-discuss] Snowball release cycle ?