Re: [Snowball-discuss] Snowball release cycle ?

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Richard Boulton <richard(at)lemurconsulting(dot)com>
Cc: Grant Ingersoll <gsingers(at)apache(dot)org>, snowball-discuss(at)lists(dot)tartarus(dot)org, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [Snowball-discuss] Snowball release cycle ?
Date: 2009-04-01 21:41:53
Message-ID: 49D3DFA1.4020903@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Richard Boulton wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 05:10:01PM -0400, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>
>> No, it would have to be ASL 2, but that is pretty similar to BSD, no?
>> (caveat: IANAL) i.e non-viral, free to use however you want, just
>> don't take credit for it. Everything I've read says the two are
>> completely compatible
>>
>
> As I understand it, ASL 2 is incompatible with GPL 2, at least according to
> the FSF. This would be a showstopper problem for me.
>
>

Er, what does Postgres have that is covered by GPL2?

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2009-04-01 21:44:53 Re: [Snowball-discuss] Snowball release cycle ?
Previous Message Robert Haas 2009-04-01 21:33:29 Re: [HACKERS] string_to_array with empty input