Re: [Snowball-discuss] Snowball release cycle ?

From: Richard Boulton <richard(at)lemurconsulting(dot)com>
To: Grant Ingersoll <gsingers(at)apache(dot)org>
Cc: snowball-discuss(at)lists(dot)tartarus(dot)org, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [Snowball-discuss] Snowball release cycle ?
Date: 2009-04-01 21:11:51
Message-ID: 20090401211151.GA14979@meerkat
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 05:10:01PM -0400, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> No, it would have to be ASL 2, but that is pretty similar to BSD, no?
> (caveat: IANAL) i.e non-viral, free to use however you want, just
> don't take credit for it. Everything I've read says the two are
> completely compatible

As I understand it, ASL 2 is incompatible with GPL 2, at least according to
the FSF. This would be a showstopper problem for me.

--
Richard

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-04-01 21:22:29 Re: [HACKERS] string_to_array with empty input
Previous Message Grant Ingersoll 2009-04-01 21:10:01 Re: [Snowball-discuss] Snowball release cycle ?