Re: Function C and INOUT parameters

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Greg Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Function C and INOUT parameters
Date: 2009-03-25 11:46:53
Message-ID: 49CA19AD.9060100@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-www

Tom Lane wrote:
> It does look like -interfaces is dying: almost no traffic, and what
> questions it does get are off-topic more often than not. Partly this
> is because the -jdbc, -odbc, and -php lists suck away all the traffic
> about those interfaces, leaving not much. So we could kill -interfaces
> without much loss IMHO.

It was supposed to have been killed already, as per last year's dev
meeting and subsequent discussion. Someone just needs to do it.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2009-03-25 12:12:47 Re: contrib function naming, and upgrade issues
Previous Message Gurjeet Singh 2009-03-25 09:59:37 Re: display previous query string of idle-in-transaction

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2009-03-25 15:11:08 shut down pgsql-interfaces (was Re: [HACKERS] Function C and INOUT parameters)
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2009-03-25 01:34:35 Re: Function C and INOUT parameters