| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Greg Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Function C and INOUT parameters |
| Date: | 2009-03-25 01:18:44 |
| Message-ID: | 14090.1237943924@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> I'm not sure about -interfaces, but -performance, -sql, -jdbc and others
> definitely have specific audiences and themes which they are already
> handling a *lot* of traffic for.
It does look like -interfaces is dying: almost no traffic, and what
questions it does get are off-topic more often than not. Partly this
is because the -jdbc, -odbc, and -php lists suck away all the traffic
about those interfaces, leaving not much. So we could kill -interfaces
without much loss IMHO.
The other global lists seem to be in good health from what I can see.
Can't speak to the regional or user-group lists, I don't follow them.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2009-03-25 01:34:35 | Re: Function C and INOUT parameters |
| Previous Message | Andrew Gierth | 2009-03-25 01:17:44 | Re: improving concurrent transactin commit rate |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2009-03-25 01:34:35 | Re: Function C and INOUT parameters |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2009-03-25 01:03:15 | Re: Function C and INOUT parameters |