Re: Function C and INOUT parameters

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Greg Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Function C and INOUT parameters
Date: 2009-03-25 01:03:15
Message-ID: 49C982D3.1060300@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-www


> Personally I'm of the opinion we should eliminate most of these
> duplicative mailing lists like -performance and -interfaces and just
> use -general. I don't see that having multiple lists for user
> questions helps either the users or the answerers due to just this
> type of problem.

... and instead drive new users away by forcing them to sign up for one
massive 400 posts/day list?

I'm not sure about -interfaces, but -performance, -sql, -jdbc and others
definitely have specific audiences and themes which they are already
handling a *lot* of traffic for.

--Josh

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Gierth 2009-03-25 01:11:23 Re: hstore patch, part 2
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-03-25 00:55:31 Re: DTrace probes broken in HEAD on Solaris?

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-03-25 01:18:44 Re: Function C and INOUT parameters
Previous Message Robert Haas 2009-03-24 18:21:22 Re: Function C and INOUT parameters