Re: Function C and INOUT parameters

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Greg Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Function C and INOUT parameters
Date: 2009-03-25 01:34:35
Message-ID: 49C98A2B.7090401@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-www

Tom,

> The other global lists seem to be in good health from what I can see.
> Can't speak to the regional or user-group lists, I don't follow them.

Those have specific reasons to survive regardless of traffic level.

--Josh

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2009-03-25 02:21:25 Re: improving concurrent transactin commit rate
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-03-25 01:18:44 Re: Function C and INOUT parameters

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2009-03-25 11:46:53 Re: Function C and INOUT parameters
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-03-25 01:18:44 Re: Function C and INOUT parameters