shut down pgsql-interfaces (was Re: [HACKERS] Function C and INOUT parameters)

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Greg Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, w^3 <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: shut down pgsql-interfaces (was Re: [HACKERS] Function C and INOUT parameters)
Date: 2009-03-25 15:11:08
Message-ID: 20090325151107.GO16373@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-www

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> It does look like -interfaces is dying: almost no traffic, and what
>> questions it does get are off-topic more often than not. Partly this
>> is because the -jdbc, -odbc, and -php lists suck away all the traffic
>> about those interfaces, leaving not much. So we could kill -interfaces
>> without much loss IMHO.
>
> It was supposed to have been killed already, as per last year's dev
> meeting and subsequent discussion. Someone just needs to do it.

Okay, I've moved it to the inactive group; it already shows up as such
in archives, and www will be updated as soon as it rebuilds and
propagates to the mirrors.

As for actually shutting it down in Majordomo, Marc is the man.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-03-25 15:15:50 Re: improving concurrent transactin commit rate
Previous Message Greg Stark 2009-03-25 14:38:45 Re: improving concurrent transactin commit rate

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2009-03-25 18:19:57 Re: shut down pgsql-interfaces (was Re: [HACKERS] Function C and INOUT parameters)
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2009-03-25 11:46:53 Re: Function C and INOUT parameters