| From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)CommandPrompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |
| Date: | 2007-09-03 19:52:51 |
| Message-ID: | 46DC6613.405@postgresql.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-de-allgemein |
Devrim GÜNDÜZ wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 2007-09-03 at 13:20 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> The totals are 15 for no change and 30 for a change to "Postgres".
>
> So ~ 45 votes among hundreds of subscribers? Even this low number proves
> that this discussion is useless, IMHO. -- let's spend our time for
> better things. Will this change make PostgreSQL faster? Or will it add a
> big major feature that will attract thousands of new users? I don't
> think so.
On that basis we'd never be able to make *any* decisions.
/D
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2007-09-03 19:54:07 | Re: [CORE] Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |
| Previous Message | Andy Astor | 2007-09-03 19:52:14 | Re: [CORE] Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2007-09-03 19:54:07 | Re: [CORE] Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |
| Previous Message | Andy Astor | 2007-09-03 19:52:14 | Re: [CORE] Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |