| From: | Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)CommandPrompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |
| Date: | 2007-09-03 19:39:49 |
| Message-ID: | 1188848389.2680.7.camel@laptop.gunduz.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-de-allgemein |
Hi,
On Mon, 2007-09-03 at 13:20 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> The totals are 15 for no change and 30 for a change to "Postgres".
So ~ 45 votes among hundreds of subscribers? Even this low number proves
that this discussion is useless, IMHO. -- let's spend our time for
better things. Will this change make PostgreSQL faster? Or will it add a
big major feature that will attract thousands of new users? I don't
think so.
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, ODBCng - http://www.commandprompt.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-09-03 19:43:52 | Re: [CORE] Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |
| Previous Message | Devrim GÜNDÜZ | 2007-09-03 19:20:54 | Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-09-03 19:43:52 | Re: [CORE] Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |
| Previous Message | Devrim GÜNDÜZ | 2007-09-03 19:20:54 | Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |