Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)

From: "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "PostgreSQL advocacy" <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
Date: 2007-09-03 19:52:03
Message-ID: 36e682920709031252m42fd38b6i8cb2cbfec1fc47e5@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-de-allgemein

On 9/3/07, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> So ~ 45 votes among hundreds of subscribers? Even this low number proves
> that this discussion is useless, IMHO. -- let's spend our time for
> better things. Will this change make PostgreSQL faster? Or will it add a
> big major feature that will attract thousands of new users? I don't
> think so.

On the other hand, if advocacy continues to stumble, perhaps there
will be no one to give a damn about, "big major feature X".

I agree, there is a lot of discussion here that may lead to nowhere.
Nevertheless, it's a discussion that needs to happen sooner-or-later.

--
Jonah H. Harris, Software Architect | phone: 732.331.1324
EnterpriseDB Corporation | fax: 732.331.1301
33 Wood Ave S, 3rd Floor | jharris(at)enterprisedb(dot)com
Iselin, New Jersey 08830 | http://www.enterprisedb.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andy Astor 2007-09-03 19:52:14 Re: [CORE] Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2007-09-03 19:51:02 Re: [CORE] Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)

Browse pgsql-de-allgemein by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andy Astor 2007-09-03 19:52:14 Re: [CORE] Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2007-09-03 19:51:02 Re: [CORE] Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)