From: | "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "PostgreSQL advocacy" <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |
Date: | 2007-09-03 19:52:03 |
Message-ID: | 36e682920709031252m42fd38b6i8cb2cbfec1fc47e5@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-de-allgemein |
On 9/3/07, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> So ~ 45 votes among hundreds of subscribers? Even this low number proves
> that this discussion is useless, IMHO. -- let's spend our time for
> better things. Will this change make PostgreSQL faster? Or will it add a
> big major feature that will attract thousands of new users? I don't
> think so.
On the other hand, if advocacy continues to stumble, perhaps there
will be no one to give a damn about, "big major feature X".
I agree, there is a lot of discussion here that may lead to nowhere.
Nevertheless, it's a discussion that needs to happen sooner-or-later.
--
Jonah H. Harris, Software Architect | phone: 732.331.1324
EnterpriseDB Corporation | fax: 732.331.1301
33 Wood Ave S, 3rd Floor | jharris(at)enterprisedb(dot)com
Iselin, New Jersey 08830 | http://www.enterprisedb.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andy Astor | 2007-09-03 19:52:14 | Re: [CORE] Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-09-03 19:51:02 | Re: [CORE] Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andy Astor | 2007-09-03 19:52:14 | Re: [CORE] Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-09-03 19:51:02 | Re: [CORE] Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |