Re: [CORE] Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)

Tom,

With all respect, I think the -advocacy group is *very* interested in the
ensuing costs, and is willing to pitch in.

As I see it, -advocacy is the group most interested in the public face of
PostgreSQL, and is very appropriate for this kind of debate.

andy

On 9/3/07 3:43 PM, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
>> This shows 70% in favor of a change to "Postgres", so far.
>
> Of course, that's 70% of -advocacy, which by nature is going to be the
> subset of the community most interested in this change and least
> interested in the ensuing costs.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>