Re: [CORE] Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [CORE] Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
Date: 2007-09-03 19:51:02
Message-ID: 200709031951.l83Jp2602129@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-de-allgemein

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > This shows 70% in favor of a change to "Postgres", so far.
>
> Of course, that's 70% of -advocacy, which by nature is going to be the
> subset of the community most interested in this change and least
> interested in the ensuing costs.

It seems there were a significant number of people with swag who will
pay the cost somehow.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jonah H. Harris 2007-09-03 19:52:03 Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
Previous Message Jonah H. Harris 2007-09-03 19:47:43 Re: A renaming analogy

Browse pgsql-de-allgemein by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jonah H. Harris 2007-09-03 19:52:03 Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-09-03 19:43:52 Re: [CORE] Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)