From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [CORE] Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |
Date: | 2007-09-03 19:51:02 |
Message-ID: | 200709031951.l83Jp2602129@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-de-allgemein |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > This shows 70% in favor of a change to "Postgres", so far.
>
> Of course, that's 70% of -advocacy, which by nature is going to be the
> subset of the community most interested in this change and least
> interested in the ensuing costs.
It seems there were a significant number of people with swag who will
pay the cost somehow.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jonah H. Harris | 2007-09-03 19:52:03 | Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |
Previous Message | Jonah H. Harris | 2007-09-03 19:47:43 | Re: A renaming analogy |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jonah H. Harris | 2007-09-03 19:52:03 | Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-09-03 19:43:52 | Re: [CORE] Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |