From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [CORE] Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |
Date: | 2007-09-03 20:00:27 |
Message-ID: | 25150.1188849627@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-de-allgemein |
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Of course, that's 70% of -advocacy, which by nature is going to be the
>> subset of the community most interested in this change and least
>> interested in the ensuing costs.
> It seems there were a significant number of people with swag who will
> pay the cost somehow.
That's adopting exactly the view I thought it was, that only directly
marketing-related costs matter. Again, this seems to be considering
only advocacy-related concerns.
I'll confine my reply to one point: do you have any idea what will
happen if I try to change the default PGDATA location on Red Hat
from /var/lib/pgsql to something else?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jonah H. Harris | 2007-09-03 20:05:29 | Re: [CORE] Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |
Previous Message | Jonah H. Harris | 2007-09-03 19:56:40 | Re: Change the name (was: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)) |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jonah H. Harris | 2007-09-03 20:05:29 | Re: [CORE] Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |
Previous Message | Jonah H. Harris | 2007-09-03 19:56:40 | Re: Change the name (was: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)) |