Re: [CORE] Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)

From: Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: [CORE] Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
Date: 2007-09-03 21:59:32
Message-ID: 46DC83C4.7010803@cheapcomplexdevices.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-de-allgemein

Tom Lane wrote:
>
> I'll confine my reply to one point: do you have any idea what will
> happen if I try to change the default PGDATA location on Red Hat
> from /var/lib/pgsql to something else?

This seems 100% orthogonal to the naming conversation.

Unless, perhaps Red Hat was in the middle of an
expensive migration to
/var/lib/PostgreSQL
that noone told their customers about.

If you wanted, a completely separate conversation could
be whether distros should convert various less common
short form (like pgsql) to some set of brand names - but
I think both the PostgreSQL and Postgres and even Postgre
advocates would say it's silly to rename pgsql to any
of those 3 terms.

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ron Mayer 2007-09-03 22:13:49 Re: [CORE] Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
Previous Message Andrew Sullivan 2007-09-03 21:48:20 Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)

Browse pgsql-de-allgemein by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ron Mayer 2007-09-03 22:13:49 Re: [CORE] Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
Previous Message Andrew Sullivan 2007-09-03 21:48:20 Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)