From: | Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Subject: | Re: [CORE] Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |
Date: | 2007-09-03 21:59:32 |
Message-ID: | 46DC83C4.7010803@cheapcomplexdevices.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-de-allgemein |
Tom Lane wrote:
>
> I'll confine my reply to one point: do you have any idea what will
> happen if I try to change the default PGDATA location on Red Hat
> from /var/lib/pgsql to something else?
This seems 100% orthogonal to the naming conversation.
Unless, perhaps Red Hat was in the middle of an
expensive migration to
/var/lib/PostgreSQL
that noone told their customers about.
If you wanted, a completely separate conversation could
be whether distros should convert various less common
short form (like pgsql) to some set of brand names - but
I think both the PostgreSQL and Postgres and even Postgre
advocates would say it's silly to rename pgsql to any
of those 3 terms.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ron Mayer | 2007-09-03 22:13:49 | Re: [CORE] Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |
Previous Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2007-09-03 21:48:20 | Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ron Mayer | 2007-09-03 22:13:49 | Re: [CORE] Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |
Previous Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2007-09-03 21:48:20 | Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |