Re: [CORE] Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)

From: "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "PostgreSQL advocacy" <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [CORE] Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
Date: 2007-09-03 20:05:29
Message-ID: 36e682920709031305w191fdec4y2666958649dde74c@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-de-allgemein

On 9/3/07, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> That's adopting exactly the view I thought it was, that only directly
> marketing-related costs matter. Again, this seems to be considering
> only advocacy-related concerns.

No.

> I'll confine my reply to one point: do you have any idea what will
> happen if I try to change the default PGDATA location on Red Hat
> from /var/lib/pgsql to something else?

Um, I thought it was already briefly discussed that directories and
config file names could and should remain the same?

--
Jonah H. Harris, Software Architect | phone: 732.331.1324
EnterpriseDB Corporation | fax: 732.331.1301
33 Wood Ave S, 3rd Floor | jharris(at)enterprisedb(dot)com
Iselin, New Jersey 08830 | http://www.enterprisedb.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2007-09-03 20:16:53 Re: [CORE] Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-09-03 20:00:27 Re: [CORE] Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)

Browse pgsql-de-allgemein by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2007-09-03 20:16:53 Re: [CORE] Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-09-03 20:00:27 Re: [CORE] Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)