From: | "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "PostgreSQL advocacy" <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [CORE] Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |
Date: | 2007-09-03 20:05:29 |
Message-ID: | 36e682920709031305w191fdec4y2666958649dde74c@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-de-allgemein |
On 9/3/07, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> That's adopting exactly the view I thought it was, that only directly
> marketing-related costs matter. Again, this seems to be considering
> only advocacy-related concerns.
No.
> I'll confine my reply to one point: do you have any idea what will
> happen if I try to change the default PGDATA location on Red Hat
> from /var/lib/pgsql to something else?
Um, I thought it was already briefly discussed that directories and
config file names could and should remain the same?
--
Jonah H. Harris, Software Architect | phone: 732.331.1324
EnterpriseDB Corporation | fax: 732.331.1301
33 Wood Ave S, 3rd Floor | jharris(at)enterprisedb(dot)com
Iselin, New Jersey 08830 | http://www.enterprisedb.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-09-03 20:16:53 | Re: [CORE] Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-09-03 20:00:27 | Re: [CORE] Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-09-03 20:16:53 | Re: [CORE] Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-09-03 20:00:27 | Re: [CORE] Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |