| From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [CORE] Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |
| Date: | 2007-09-03 19:54:07 |
| Message-ID: | 46DC665F.1000904@postgresql.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-de-allgemein |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
>> This shows 70% in favor of a change to "Postgres", so far.
>
> Of course, that's 70% of -advocacy, which by nature is going to be the
> subset of the community most interested in this change and least
> interested in the ensuing costs.
Eh? They're the very people who spend time raising cash and designing,
sourcing, purchasing and selling the swag that will be affected.
/D
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andy Astor | 2007-09-03 19:55:09 | Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2007-09-03 19:52:51 | Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andy Astor | 2007-09-03 19:55:09 | Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2007-09-03 19:52:51 | Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |