Re: libpq's pollution of application namespace

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: libpq's pollution of application namespace
Date: 2005-10-17 16:44:44
Message-ID: 4353D4FC.3080405@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:

>Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> writes:
>
>
>>What other linkers do we need to support?
>>
>>
>
>All the non-GNU ones.
>
>(I'm already desperately unhappy about the thin representation of
>non-GNU toolchains in the build farm...)
>
>
>
>

Me too. If you provide a list of the most important platforms/toolsets
missing I will see if I can talk some people into donating resources.
HPUX is a glaring hole although I know you have that covered personally.

cheers

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2005-10-17 17:02:23 Re: libpq's pollution of application namespace
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-10-17 16:43:47 Re: PostgreSQL roadmap for 8.2 and beyond.