Quick Links

Re: libpq's pollution of application namespace

From:	Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To:	Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
Cc:	pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject:	Re: libpq's pollution of application namespace
Date:	2005-10-17 16:20:06
Message-ID:	9280.1129566006@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views:	Raw Message \| Whole Thread \| Download mbox \| Resend email
Thread:
Lists:	pgsql-hackers

Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> writes:
> What other linkers do we need to support?

All the non-GNU ones.

(I'm already desperately unhappy about the thin representation of
non-GNU toolchains in the build farm...)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Re: libpq's pollution of application namespace at 2005-10-17 16:15:57 from Martijn van Oosterhout

Responses

Re: libpq's pollution of application namespace at 2005-10-17 16:44:44 from Andrew Dunstan
Re: libpq's pollution of application namespace at 2005-10-17 17:02:23 from Martijn van Oosterhout

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

	From	Date	Subject
Next Message	Tom Lane	2005-10-17 16:39:27	Re: Something wrong after file system level backup
Previous Message	Martijn van Oosterhout	2005-10-17 16:15:57	Re: libpq's pollution of application namespace