Re: libpq's pollution of application namespace

From: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: libpq's pollution of application namespace
Date: 2005-10-17 17:02:23
Message-ID: 20051017170223.GC26773@svana.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 12:20:06PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> writes:
> > What other linkers do we need to support?
>
> All the non-GNU ones.
>
> (I'm already desperately unhappy about the thin representation of
> non-GNU toolchains in the build farm...)

Ok, so it's a matter of research and testing. HPUX for example don't
have a version map and doesn't have the strip options either, but
allows you to specify:

+hideallsymbols +e sym +e sym

You can dump them all into a file and pull it in with "-c filename"

I can see a list of supported platforms [1], but not a list of
supported compilers/linkers. If it's just a matter of reasearching the
command-line options that can be done fairly easily, if anyone's
interested...

Have a nice day,

[1] http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.0/interactive/supported-platforms.html
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Patent. n. Genius is 5% inspiration and 95% perspiration. A patent is a
> tool for doing 5% of the work and then sitting around waiting for someone
> else to do the other 95% so you can sue them.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Cramer 2005-10-17 17:32:22 Re: PostgreSQL roadmap for 8.2 and beyond.
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2005-10-17 16:44:44 Re: libpq's pollution of application namespace