Re: libpq's pollution of application namespace

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> (I'm already desperately unhappy about the thin representation of
>> non-GNU toolchains in the build farm...)

> Me too. If you provide a list of the most important platforms/toolsets
> missing I will see if I can talk some people into donating resources.

Well, one way to attack it is to look at the current supported-platforms
list and try to get buildfarm representation for everything not covered
already.

http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/supported-platforms.html

I don't think we need more buildfarms running more random distros of
Linux ;-) --- unless they are running non-gcc compilers. People
should be encouraged to test with non-gcc compilers if they have any
available.

We seem to be short on buildfarm representation for AIX, HPUX, Solaris
(particularly older variants), Tru64; it'd be nice to cover all the
hardware platforms each of these runs on. For that matter, we're a bit
thin on the unusual-hardware ports of the *BSDen.

regards, tom lane