From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Zhihong Yu <zyu(at)yugabyte(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: unnesting multirange data types |
Date: | 2021-06-15 17:18:06 |
Message-ID: | 427913.1623777486@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I did run "check-world", but it passed for me. Probably the same
> reason it passed for some buildfarm animals...
The only buildfarm animals that have passed since this went in
are the ones that don't run the pg_dump or pg_upgrade tests.
It looks to me like the proximate problem is that you should
have taught pg_dump to skip these new auto-generated functions.
However, I fail to see why we need auto-generated functions
for this at all. Couldn't we have done it with one polymorphic
function?
I think this ought to be reverted and reviewed more carefully.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2021-06-15 17:28:27 | Re: unnesting multirange data types |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2021-06-15 17:11:36 | Re: a path towards replacing GEQO with something better |