Re: unnesting multirange data types

From: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Zhihong Yu <zyu(at)yugabyte(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: unnesting multirange data types
Date: 2021-06-15 16:06:50
Message-ID: CAPpHfdvcnw3x7jdV3r52p4=5S4WUxBCzcQKB3JukQHoicv1LSQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 4:49 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > Pushed! Thanks to thread participants for raising this topic and
> > review. I'll be around to resolve issues if any.
>
> Buildfarm is pretty thoroughly unhappy. Did you do a "check-world"
> before pushing?

Yes, I'm looking at this now.

I did run "check-world", but it passed for me. Probably the same
reason it passed for some buildfarm animals...

------
Regards,
Alexander Korotkov

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Pryzby 2021-06-15 16:14:56 Re: Different compression methods for FPI
Previous Message Paul Guo 2021-06-15 15:39:59 Should wal receiver reply to wal sender more aggressively?