Re: Reorganizing PG lists

> On Jan 3, 2018, at 3:46 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
>
> Jeff,
>
> * Jeff Janes (jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 1:43 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
>>> Reviewing actual usage shows that a number of the lists aren't really
>>> categorized correctly under these categories. In particular, the
>>> "Regional" lists are actually more "per-language" lists than they are
>>> "Regional" in nature. To address that, we're planning to create a new
>>> category called "Per Language Lists" (better name suggestions are
>>> welcome) and move a number of the currently "regional" lists to that
>>> category.
>>
>> I would just call then non-English lists. It clarifies that human
>> languages, not computer languages are being referred to; and seeing "per
>> language" would make me think every list (hackers, bugs, general, etc.) is
>> trying to be replicated into every language.
>
> Saying 'non-English' feel a bit English-centric to me, perhaps just list
> the initial set of lists as "English Speaking" and then have the other
> lists be "Other Language Lists”?

Or "Locallized?"

Jonathan