Re: Reorganizing PG lists

> On Jan 3, 2018, at 3:42 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
>
> Alvaro,
>
> * Alvaro Herrera (alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org <mailto:alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>) wrote:
>> Stephen Frost wrote:
>>
>>> Reviewing actual usage shows that a number of the lists aren't really
>>> categorized correctly under these categories. In particular, the
>>> "Regional" lists are actually more "per-language" lists than they are
>>> "Regional" in nature. To address that, we're planning to create a new
>>> category called "Per Language Lists" (better name suggestions are
>>> welcome) and move a number of the currently "regional" lists to that
>>> category.
>>>
>>> Individuals who are familiar with the various non-English lists are
>>> solicited to please help us distinguish the lists that are truely
>>> "Regional" from those which are really "Per-Language". My understanding
>>> is that, at least, the following lists are really per-language and not
>>> really regional:
>>>
>>> pgsql-es-ayuda
>>> pgsql-es-fomento
>>> pgsql-es-trabajos
>>> pgsql-fr-generale
>>> pgsql-de-allgemein
>>
>> I think renaming the "Regional" category to "Language" is a fine
>> solution to the most of the problem.
>
> Great, glad we agree there.
>
>> AFAICT the only non-dead PUG lists are:
>>
>> pdxpug
>> seapug
>> ecpug
>> lapug
>
> I know that pdxpug has basically said that they use Meetup and really
> don't see value in cross-posting to that list. Seapug appears to just
> be -announce repostings, and lapug also has a meetup account that they
> use. Moveing ecpug to a Regional list is fine, of course.

+1