Re: Reorganizing PG lists

Jeff,

* Jeff Janes (jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 1:43 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> > Reviewing actual usage shows that a number of the lists aren't really
> > categorized correctly under these categories. In particular, the
> > "Regional" lists are actually more "per-language" lists than they are
> > "Regional" in nature. To address that, we're planning to create a new
> > category called "Per Language Lists" (better name suggestions are
> > welcome) and move a number of the currently "regional" lists to that
> > category.
>
> I would just call then non-English lists. It clarifies that human
> languages, not computer languages are being referred to; and seeing "per
> language" would make me think every list (hackers, bugs, general, etc.) is
> trying to be replicated into every language.

Saying 'non-English' feel a bit English-centric to me, perhaps just list
the initial set of lists as "English Speaking" and then have the other
lists be "Other Language Lists"?

Thanks!

Stephen