Re: Reorganizing PG lists

* Jonathan S. Katz (jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org) wrote:
>
> > On Jan 3, 2018, at 3:46 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> >
> > Jeff,
> >
> > * Jeff Janes (jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 1:43 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> >>> Reviewing actual usage shows that a number of the lists aren't really
> >>> categorized correctly under these categories. In particular, the
> >>> "Regional" lists are actually more "per-language" lists than they are
> >>> "Regional" in nature. To address that, we're planning to create a new
> >>> category called "Per Language Lists" (better name suggestions are
> >>> welcome) and move a number of the currently "regional" lists to that
> >>> category.
> >>
> >> I would just call then non-English lists. It clarifies that human
> >> languages, not computer languages are being referred to; and seeing "per
> >> language" would make me think every list (hackers, bugs, general, etc.) is
> >> trying to be replicated into every language.
> >
> > Saying 'non-English' feel a bit English-centric to me, perhaps just list
> > the initial set of lists as "English Speaking" and then have the other
> > lists be "Other Language Lists”?
>
> Or "Locallized?"

So, the other thought that I had here was actually to have "English"
lists and then simply have a category for each of the other sets of
lists. In other words, something like:

English

User Lists
pgsql-announce
pgsql-general

Developer Lists
pgsql-hackers
pgsql-gui-dev

whatever else

German

pgsql-de-allgemein

French
pgsql-fr-generale

Spanish
pgsql-es-ayuda
pgsql-es-fomento
pgsql-es-trabajos

This makes it a bit less English-centric, imv, but keeps the more
popular lists towards the top. I'll need to chat with Magnus a bit
about making this a reality since it adds another level, but I don't
expect that to be a huge issue and it wouldn't change the actual email
addresses.

Thanks!

Stephen