| From: | Ned Lilly <ned(at)greatbridge(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dan Browning <danb(at)cyclonecomputers(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "'PostgreSQL General'" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, chrisb(at)nimrod(dot)itg(dot)telstra(dot)com(dot)au |
| Subject: | Re: Great Bridge benchmark results for Postgres, 4 others |
| Date: | 2000-08-15 16:21:25 |
| Message-ID: | 39996E05.C0739844@greatbridge.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Oh, Dan, I'm not that clever... ;-)
But I *can* tell you that the market leading proprietary RDBMS products we
tested were not IBM, Informix, or Sybase.
Regards,
Ned
Dan Browning wrote:
> > Can you tell us what version of the (ahem) unnamed
> > proprietary products
> > you used? :-). For example if you used version 8i of an unnamed
> > proprietry product, that might be informative :-).
>
> Oh, but even if you can't tell us what version was used, I'm sure you could
> tell us that story about the monster you saw last week. But which monster
> was it? Was it the monster that ATE EYEs? And I remember you once said
> there was a second monster, could you describe it as well?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Armando Racchum Piscoya | 2000-08-15 16:22:46 | Error with PostgreSQL - IMP |
| Previous Message | Ned Lilly | 2000-08-15 16:20:01 | Re: Great Bridge benchmark results for Postgres, 4 others |