Re: Great Bridge benchmark results for Postgres, 4 others

From: "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu>
To: "'PostgreSQL General'" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Great Bridge benchmark results for Postgres, 4 others
Date: 2000-08-15 16:45:51
Message-ID: 20000815114551.B24051@rice.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tue, Aug 15, 2000 at 12:21:25PM -0400, Ned Lilly wrote:
> Oh, Dan, I'm not that clever... ;-)
>
> But I *can* tell you that the market leading proprietary RDBMS products we
> tested were not IBM, Informix, or Sybase.
>

And in reply to the MySQL version comment/question, Ned said:
"We only used the released versions of each database."

I took that to mean they used the latest released version of each
database. One thing I couldn't deduce: which operating system where the
commercial RDBMs run on top of? NT for one of them, for sure, but the
other can probably run on either of the quoted OSs. If it was run on NT,
we might be seeing the linux vs. NT effect.

Ross
--
Ross J. Reedstrom, Ph.D., <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu>
NSBRI Research Scientist/Programmer
Computer and Information Technology Institute
Rice University, 6100 S. Main St., Houston, TX 77005

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Steve Wolfe 2000-08-15 16:47:57 Tuning PostgreSQL to use more RAM...
Previous Message Ned Lilly 2000-08-15 16:29:11 Re: Great Bridge benchmark results for Postgres, 4 others