| From: | Ned Lilly <ned(at)greatbridge(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jeff Hoffmann <jeff(at)propertykey(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, Richard Brosnahan <rbrosnahan(at)xperts(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Great Bridge benchmark results for Postgres, 4 others |
| Date: | 2000-08-15 16:29:11 |
| Message-ID: | 39996FD7.5B9172A6@greatbridge.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Doh! Sorry, I didn't cc Richard Brosnahan after all. He's at
<rbrosnahan(at)xperts(dot)com>
Ned Lilly wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
>
> > i haven't played with interbase yet, but my understanding is they have
> > two types of server -- the "classic" (process per connection?) and a
> > "superserver" (multithreaded). i'm guessing the multithreaded is faster
> > (why bother with the added complexity if it isn't?) so which version
> > did you run this test against?
>
> Classic. Superserver didn't work with the ODBC driver. Richard Brosnahan,
> the lead engineer on the project at Xperts, could connect, but could not
> successfully build tables and load them due to SQL errors. Feel free to
> contact him directly (he's cc'ed here).
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ross J. Reedstrom | 2000-08-15 16:45:51 | Re: Great Bridge benchmark results for Postgres, 4 others |
| Previous Message | Ned Lilly | 2000-08-15 16:27:41 | Re: Re: Great Bridge benchmark results for Postgres, 4 others |