Re: Great Bridge benchmark results for Postgres, 4 others

From: Chris Bitmead <chrisb(at)nimrod(dot)itg(dot)telstra(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Ned Lilly <ned(at)greatbridge(dot)com>
Cc: "'PostgreSQL General'" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Great Bridge benchmark results for Postgres, 4 others
Date: 2000-08-16 00:03:38
Message-ID: 3999DA5A.63DE6FAA@nimrod.itg.telecom.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Ned Lilly wrote:
>
> Oh, Dan, I'm not that clever... ;-)
>
> But I *can* tell you that the market leading proprietary RDBMS products we
> tested were not IBM, Informix, or Sybase.

That's very helpful. Can you also tell us if Proprietry 1 or Proprietry
2 was definitely NOT MS-SQL Server?

>
> Regards,
> Ned
>
> Dan Browning wrote:
>
> > > Can you tell us what version of the (ahem) unnamed
> > > proprietary products
> > > you used? :-). For example if you used version 8i of an unnamed
> > > proprietry product, that might be informative :-).
> >
> > Oh, but even if you can't tell us what version was used, I'm sure you could
> > tell us that story about the monster you saw last week. But which monster
> > was it? Was it the monster that ATE EYEs? And I remember you once said
> > there was a second monster, could you describe it as well?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomaz Borstnar 2000-08-16 00:06:19 Re: mod_auth_pgsql
Previous Message J. Mauricio Cuenca H. 2000-08-15 23:59:43 Problems after installing