From: | Chris Bitmead <chrisb(at)nimrod(dot)itg(dot)telstra(dot)com(dot)au> |
---|---|
To: | Ned Lilly <ned(at)greatbridge(dot)com> |
Cc: | "'PostgreSQL General'" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Great Bridge benchmark results for Postgres, 4 others |
Date: | 2000-08-16 00:03:38 |
Message-ID: | 3999DA5A.63DE6FAA@nimrod.itg.telecom.com.au |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Ned Lilly wrote:
>
> Oh, Dan, I'm not that clever... ;-)
>
> But I *can* tell you that the market leading proprietary RDBMS products we
> tested were not IBM, Informix, or Sybase.
That's very helpful. Can you also tell us if Proprietry 1 or Proprietry
2 was definitely NOT MS-SQL Server?
>
> Regards,
> Ned
>
> Dan Browning wrote:
>
> > > Can you tell us what version of the (ahem) unnamed
> > > proprietary products
> > > you used? :-). For example if you used version 8i of an unnamed
> > > proprietry product, that might be informative :-).
> >
> > Oh, but even if you can't tell us what version was used, I'm sure you could
> > tell us that story about the monster you saw last week. But which monster
> > was it? Was it the monster that ATE EYEs? And I remember you once said
> > there was a second monster, could you describe it as well?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tomaz Borstnar | 2000-08-16 00:06:19 | Re: mod_auth_pgsql |
Previous Message | J. Mauricio Cuenca H. | 2000-08-15 23:59:43 | Problems after installing |