Re: Great Bridge benchmark results for Postgres, 4 others

From: Ned Lilly <ned(at)greatbridge(dot)com>
To: Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Great Bridge benchmark results for Postgres, 4 others
Date: 2000-08-15 16:20:01
Message-ID: 39996DB1.F6307BB2@greatbridge.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Good question, Tatsuo... We ran it with and without fsync() - there was
only a 2-3% difference between the two.

Tatsuo Ishii wrote:

> Great work!
>
> BTW, was the postmaster configured to have an option "-o -F" to
> disable fsync()?
> --
> Tatsuo Ishii

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ned Lilly 2000-08-15 16:21:25 Re: Great Bridge benchmark results for Postgres, 4 others
Previous Message Ned Lilly 2000-08-15 16:16:17 Re: Great Bridge benchmark results for Postgres, 4 others