Re: quiet inline configure check misses a step for clang

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: quiet inline configure check misses a step for clang
Date: 2014-05-01 14:10:46
Message-ID: 27581.1398953446@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> I still think we really need to fix this. I have three possible
> solutions:

> a) Add an external file (in the source tree) that's included in the
> configure test.
> b) Have a compiler specific override and specify USE_INLINE there.
> c) Drop the requirement of quiet inlines.

> a) would probably the best, but I haven't yet found a non ugly solution :(

Why is (a) so hard again?

(If you're wondering where to put the file, I'd vote for the config/
directory.)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2014-05-01 14:12:56 Re: quiet inline configure check misses a step for clang
Previous Message Tom Lane 2014-05-01 14:08:51 Re: Why do we allow indexes to contain the same column more than once?