Re: quiet inline configure check misses a step for clang

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: quiet inline configure check misses a step for clang
Date: 2014-05-01 13:57:00
Message-ID: 20140501135700.GB14243@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2014-04-03 12:47:00 +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
> The current quiet inline test doesn't work for clang. As e.g. evidenced in
> http://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_stage_log.pl?nm=gull&dt=2014-04-03%2007%3A49%3A26&stg=configure
> configure thinks it's not quiet.
>
> Which means that postgres compiled with a recent clang will be noticably
> slower than it needs to be.
>
> The reason for that is that clang is smart and warns about static inline
> if they are declared locally in the .c file, but not if they are
> declared in a #included file. That seems to be a reasonable
> behaviour...
>
> I think that needs to be fixed. We either can make the configure test
> considerably more complex or simply drop the requirement for quiet
> inline.

I still think we really need to fix this. I have three possible
solutions:

a) Add an external file (in the source tree) that's included in the
configure test.
b) Have a compiler specific override and specify USE_INLINE there.
c) Drop the requirement of quiet inlines.

a) would probably the best, but I haven't yet found a non ugly solution :(

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2014-05-01 14:06:39 Re: Successor of MD5 authentication, let's use SCRAM
Previous Message Tom Lane 2014-05-01 13:47:00 Re: improving \dt++ in psql