| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Filip Rembiałkowski <filip(dot)rembialkowski(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: improving \dt++ in psql |
| Date: | 2014-05-01 13:47:00 |
| Message-ID: | 26974.1398952020@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
=?UTF-8?Q?Filip_Rembia=C5=82kowski?= <filip(dot)rembialkowski(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I was (as a long time Pg user) dead sure that psql really sometimes
> cares about the number of plus signs that you add to meta-command
No, it never has done so AFAIK.
> Can't we have higher levels of "verbosiness"?
I think that for most commands, two levels of verbosity are already
complicating the code in describe.c about as much as it can stand :-(
Things like the infrastructure to mark particular columns as translatable
would really need some significant work if we want to adopt multiple
pluses as a standard design element.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2014-05-01 13:57:00 | Re: quiet inline configure check misses a step for clang |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2014-05-01 13:11:31 | Re: Why do we allow indexes to contain the same column more than once? |