From: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru> |
Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY does not index prepared xact's data |
Date: | 2021-07-23 22:30:21 |
Message-ID: | 20210723223021.GA1354601@gust.leadboat.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 09:33:18PM +0500, Andrey Borodin wrote:
> > 21 июля 2021 г., в 22:55, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> написал(а):
> > These drafts use reasonable concepts. Would you develop them into a
> > ready-to-commit patch? You may be able to translate your probabilistic test
> > procedures from https://gist.github.com/x4m/8b6025995eedf29bf588727375014dfc
> > into something like the src/bin/pgbench/t/001_pgbench_with_server.pl test of
> > pg_enum_oid_index.
>
> I'm working on it. Is it OK to use amcheck in pgbench tests? Or is it better to add the test to amcheck?
It could be okay, but I think it's better to add the test under amcheck. You
could still use pgbench in the test.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2021-07-23 22:53:19 | Re: CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY does not index prepared xact's data |
Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2021-07-23 21:47:33 | Re: IRe: BUG #16792: silent corruption of GIN index resulting in SELECTs returning non-matching rows |