Re: CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY does not index prepared xact's data

From: Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>
To: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY does not index prepared xact's data
Date: 2021-07-23 16:33:18
Message-ID: 946242CB-D63A-4D7B-A5A5-485165F5B78A@yandex-team.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

> 21 июля 2021 г., в 22:55, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> написал(а):
>
> These drafts use reasonable concepts. Would you develop them into a
> ready-to-commit patch? You may be able to translate your probabilistic test
> procedures from https://gist.github.com/x4m/8b6025995eedf29bf588727375014dfc
> into something like the src/bin/pgbench/t/001_pgbench_with_server.pl test of
> pg_enum_oid_index.

I'm working on it. Is it OK to use amcheck in pgbench tests? Or is it better to add the test to amcheck?

Best regards, Andrey Borodin.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2021-07-23 21:47:33 Re: IRe: BUG #16792: silent corruption of GIN index resulting in SELECTs returning non-matching rows
Previous Message Tom Lane 2021-07-23 16:12:46 Re: BUG #17122: panic on prepare with subsequent pg_advisory_lock() and pg_advisory_xact_lock_shared()