Re: partitioned tables and contrib/sepgsql

Joe,

* Joe Conway (mail(at)joeconway(dot)com) wrote:
> On 04/07/2017 05:36 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 5:22 PM, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> wrote:
> >> 1) commit the 0002 patch now before the feature freeze and follow up
> >> with the regression test patch when ready in a couple of days
> >> 2) hold off on both patches until ready
> >> 3) push both patches to the next commitfest/pg11
> >>
> >> Some argue this is an open issue against the new partitioning feature in
> >> pg10 and therefore should be addressed now, and others do not. I can see
> >> both sides of that argument.
> >>
> >> In any case, thoughts on what to do?
> >
> > Speaking only for myself, I'm OK with any of those options, provided
> > that that "a couple" means what my dictionary says it means.
>
> Thanks. I'd prefer not to do #1 actually, and I think we can adhere to
> the dictionary meaning of "a couple" (i.e. by EOD Sunday). Assuming we
> are ready by Sunday I will push both together (#2) or else I will move
> them both together to the next CF (#3).

Sounds good to me.

Thanks!

Stephen