Re: snapbuild woes

From: Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: snapbuild woes
Date: 2017-04-08 14:29:10
Message-ID: aac311f8b41582e08ccb127d3a553e0d@xs4all.nl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2017-04-08 15:56, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2017-04-08 09:51:39 -0400, David Steele wrote:
>> On 3/2/17 7:54 PM, Petr Jelinek wrote:
>> >
>> > Yes the copy patch needs rebase as well. But these ones are fine.
>>
>> This bug has been moved to CF 2017-07.
>
> FWIW, as these are bug-fixes that need to be backpatched, I do plan to
> work on them soon.
>

CF 2017-07 pertains to postgres 11, is that right?

But I hope you mean to commit these snapbuild patches before the
postgres 10 release? As far as I know, logical replication is still
very broken without them (or at least some of that set of 5 patches - I
don't know which ones are essential and which may not be).

If it's at all useful I can repeat tests to show how often current
master still fails (easily 50% or so failure-rate).

This would be the pgbench-over-logical-replication test that I did so
often earlier on.

thanks,

Erik Rijkers

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2017-04-08 14:29:21 Re: partitioned tables and contrib/sepgsql
Previous Message Andres Freund 2017-04-08 14:27:15 Re: 2017-03 CF Closed