| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl> |
| Cc: | David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: snapbuild woes |
| Date: | 2017-04-08 14:30:59 |
| Message-ID: | 20170408143059.nrzuwyvv5apnhhta@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2017-04-08 16:29:10 +0200, Erik Rijkers wrote:
> On 2017-04-08 15:56, Andres Freund wrote:
> > On 2017-04-08 09:51:39 -0400, David Steele wrote:
> > > On 3/2/17 7:54 PM, Petr Jelinek wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Yes the copy patch needs rebase as well. But these ones are fine.
> > >
> > > This bug has been moved to CF 2017-07.
> >
> > FWIW, as these are bug-fixes that need to be backpatched, I do plan to
> > work on them soon.
> >
>
> CF 2017-07 pertains to postgres 11, is that right?
>
> But I hope you mean to commit these snapbuild patches before the postgres 10
> release? As far as I know, logical replication is still very broken without
> them (or at least some of that set of 5 patches - I don't know which ones
> are essential and which may not be).
Yes, these should go into 10 *and* earlier releases, and I don't plan to
wait for 2017-07.
- Andres
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Steele | 2017-04-08 14:32:10 | Re: snapbuild woes |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2017-04-08 14:29:21 | Re: partitioned tables and contrib/sepgsql |