| From: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Mike Palmiotto <mike(dot)palmiotto(at)crunchydata(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: partitioned tables and contrib/sepgsql |
| Date: | 2017-04-08 02:36:49 |
| Message-ID: | b2803a54-41c8-9400-c29c-6f6672509b9c@joeconway.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 04/07/2017 05:36 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 5:22 PM, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> wrote:
>> 1) commit the 0002 patch now before the feature freeze and follow up
>> with the regression test patch when ready in a couple of days
>> 2) hold off on both patches until ready
>> 3) push both patches to the next commitfest/pg11
>>
>> Some argue this is an open issue against the new partitioning feature in
>> pg10 and therefore should be addressed now, and others do not. I can see
>> both sides of that argument.
>>
>> In any case, thoughts on what to do?
>
> Speaking only for myself, I'm OK with any of those options, provided
> that that "a couple" means what my dictionary says it means.
Thanks. I'd prefer not to do #1 actually, and I think we can adhere to
the dictionary meaning of "a couple" (i.e. by EOD Sunday). Assuming we
are ready by Sunday I will push both together (#2) or else I will move
them both together to the next CF (#3).
Joe
--
Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com
PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises
Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Munro | 2017-04-08 02:46:04 | Re: valgrind errors around dsa.c |
| Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2017-04-08 02:24:40 | Re: recent deadlock regression test failures |